Re: idea for concurrent seqscans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date
Msg-id 200502260151.j1Q1peq21392@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes:
> > > I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume
> > > the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)?
> > 
> > We use diff as the checking tool.
> 
> Doesn't the SQL spec specifically state that the only time you'll get
> results in a deterministic order is if you use ORDER BY? Assuming
> otherwise seems a bad idea (though at least in the case of testing it
> makes the test more strenuous rather than less...)

The only trick I can think of is to use SELECT ... INTO TEMPORARY tab
... oRDER BY and then use COPY to dump the table.  It will then dump in
the order of the ORDER BY.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans