Re: UTF8 or Unicode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Date
Msg-id 200502251732.22414.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UTF8 or Unicode  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: UTF8 or Unicode
List pgsql-hackers
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:26 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> OK, but what about latin1?

The following character set names are specified in the SQL standard and 
therefore somewhat non-negotiable:

SQL_CHARACTER
GRAPHIC_IRV
LATIN1
ISO8BIT
UTF16
UTF8
UCS2
SQL_TEXT
SQL_IDENTIFIER

So we have to use LATIN1, even though it creates an inconsistency.  We 
discussed this a while ago during the last great renaming, I think.

Btw., I think ISO8BIT is the correct name for what we call SQL_ASCII, but I 
haven't analyzed that in detail, yet.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Development Plans
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Development Plans