Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:26 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > OK, but what about latin1?
>
> The following character set names are specified in the SQL standard and
> therefore somewhat non-negotiable:
>
> SQL_CHARACTER
> GRAPHIC_IRV
> LATIN1
> ISO8BIT
> UTF16
> UTF8
> UCS2
> SQL_TEXT
> SQL_IDENTIFIER
>
> So we have to use LATIN1, even though it creates an inconsistency. We
> discussed this a while ago during the last great renaming, I think.
>
Oh, UTF8 and not UTF-8? I thought UTF-8 was the standard name, but if
ANSI uses UTF8 we will have to use that.
> Btw., I think ISO8BIT is the correct name for what we call SQL_ASCII, but I
> haven't analyzed that in detail, yet.
OK, please let us know.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
