Re: Some download statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Some download statistics
Date
Msg-id 20050225145255.GI84483@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some download statistics  (Ernst Herzberg <list-pgsql-hackers@net4u.de>)
Responses Re: Some download statistics  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:27:03PM +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote:
> On Thursday 24 February 2005 21:43, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> [.......]
> > >
> > >     pub/source/v.8.0.1/
> > >         postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2
> > >         postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
> > >         postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz
> > >         postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz.md5
> > >         split-tarballs/
> > >             postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2
> > >             postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
> > >             etc...
> >
> > That sounds like a reasonable compromise ... I could do that right away,
> > if nobody is in disagreement ... ?
> 
> Hm, there is a distribution that uses the split tarballs: gentoo.
> 
> snipped from /usr/portage/dev-db/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.1-r1.ebuild :
> 
> SRC_URI="mirror://postgresql/source/v${PV}/${PN}-base-${MY_PV}.tar.bz2
>     mirror://postgresql/source/v${PV}/${PN}-opt-${MY_PV}.tar.bz2
>     doc? ( mirror://postgresql/source/v${PV}/${PN}-docs-${MY_PV}.tar.bz2 )"
> 
> Better is to drop a 'bug' to bugs.gentoo.org so that the ebuild will be 
> fixed;-)

How exactly is that a bug? Why should someone spend time downloading the
docs if they don't want to install them? And gentoo isn't the only OS
that uses them.

Unless generating the splits requires a non-trivial amount of work, I
see no reason not to have them.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Where are we on stored procedures?