Thread: ecpg thread-safe descriptor
Here is a patch to fix thread-safety of SQL DESCRIPTOR in ecpg. The global variable 'all_descriptors' is split into per-thread vars. There was another idea of splitting into per-connection vars, but I did not do that because there are allocating descriptors before connection and deallocating after disconnection in the regression test. The attached descriptor.pgc is a test case for the issue. It is not included into regression test of ecpg. If this change is acceptable to be applied to HEAD, I'll start backporting recent fixes (prepared statement, memory allocation and descriptor) to 8.2 (and older versions if possible). Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:38:09PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Here is a patch to fix thread-safety of SQL DESCRIPTOR in ecpg. > > The global variable 'all_descriptors' is split into per-thread vars. > There was another idea of splitting into per-connection vars, but > I did not do that because there are allocating descriptors before > connection and deallocating after disconnection in the regression test. > > The attached descriptor.pgc is a test case for the issue. > It is not included into regression test of ecpg. (haven't looked at the patch itself) > If this change is acceptable to be applied to HEAD, I'll start backporting > recent fixes (prepared statement, memory allocation and descriptor) to 8.2 > (and older versions if possible). Are you sure we should backport this to 8.2 and earlier? It's fairly large changes, and not necessarily entirely straightforward (for example, the buildfarm is still partially broken from the earlier ones not being portable enough). I think this can be considered a "new feature" and not just a plain bugfix, so it should probably only go into HEAD. //Magnus
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Are you sure we should backport this to 8.2 and earlier? It's fairly large > changes, and not necessarily entirely straightforward (for example, the > buildfarm is still partially broken from the earlier ones not being > portable enough). Almost portability issues come from Windows, but ecpg in 8.2 only support thread-safety on pthread, not on Win32. So backporting is easier than expected because we can neglect Windows. I want thread-safe ecpg *NOW* and cannot wait for 8.3 release... At any rate, I'll fix it at hand and report it if it works well. BTW, do we need to distribute ecpg with server (or client library) ? If it was a separate product, I think we will be able to maintain them more flexiblly, just like libpqxx or JDBC. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:38:09PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Here is a patch to fix thread-safety of SQL DESCRIPTOR in ecpg. > ... Applied to CVS HEAD. Thanks. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:45:12PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Almost portability issues come from Windows, but ecpg in 8.2 only support > thread-safety on pthread, not on Win32. So backporting is easier than > expected because we can neglect Windows. True, but it's still a pretty huge change. I'd prefer to only backport small fixes not serious rewrites. > I want thread-safe ecpg *NOW* and cannot wait for 8.3 release... Which is a valid point for backporting your changes but NOT for including them into CVS. > BTW, do we need to distribute ecpg with server (or client library) ? > If it was a separate product, I think we will be able to maintain them > more flexiblly, just like libpqxx or JDBC. I do not agree at all with this statement. IMO it's absolutely necessary that ecpg's parser is in sync with the backend's parser. So essentially we would not gain any flexibility as we'd have to release at the same time anyway. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:23:10PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:45:12PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > > Almost portability issues come from Windows, but ecpg in 8.2 only support > > thread-safety on pthread, not on Win32. So backporting is easier than > > expected because we can neglect Windows. > > True, but it's still a pretty huge change. I'd prefer to only backport > small fixes not serious rewrites. > > > I want thread-safe ecpg *NOW* and cannot wait for 8.3 release... > > Which is a valid point for backporting your changes but NOT for > including them into CVS. Yeah, that's all I object to of course. Not the actual backporting. > > BTW, do we need to distribute ecpg with server (or client library) ? > > If it was a separate product, I think we will be able to maintain them > > more flexiblly, just like libpqxx or JDBC. > > I do not agree at all with this statement. IMO it's absolutely necessary > that ecpg's parser is in sync with the backend's parser. So essentially > we would not gain any flexibility as we'd have to release at the same > time anyway. That's the reason I recall for keeping it in there as well. Michael, any chance to consider the exports-from-libecpg issue I posted about the other day? //Magnus
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:31:37PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Which is a valid point for backporting your changes but NOT for > > including them into CVS. > > Yeah, that's all I object to of course. Not the actual backporting. This is how I understood your email anyway. :-) > Michael, any chance to consider the exports-from-libecpg issue I posted > about the other day? Could you give me some details? I have to admit that I didn't follow this discussion as close as needed because I still have no Windows setup to test with myself. Which of course means I have no idea about the Windows build process at all. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I think this can be considered a "new feature" and not just a plain bugfix,
> so it should probably only go into HEAD.
I am very nearly ready to demand that ecpg as a whole be reverted to its
state as of Saturday, with all the patches since then held for 8.4
development. At no point since Sunday morning has ecpg been passing
buildfarm testing, and I see no activity indicating that it's about to
get fixed. You guys are holding up beta release with work that by any
legitimate definition is new-feature development, and shouldn't be under
consideration at all at this point.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:39:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I am very nearly ready to demand that ecpg as a whole be reverted to its > state as of Saturday, with all the patches since then held for 8.4 > development. At no point since Sunday morning has ecpg been passing If we say ecpg is not multithreaded I agree that these patches are features, but if we see it as multithreaded the patches are bug fixes. > buildfarm testing, and I see no activity indicating that it's about to Magnus, correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that the MSVC build problem has existed for weeks or months but no one noticed so far, right? It doesn't help to revert the patches if we still do not compile cleanly on MSVC. Or is it only the DLLMAIN thing that's holding us up? If so couldn't we just remove this function and call MSVC build not multithreaded? Also Takahiro (hope this is your first name :-)), could you please explain to us why DllMain is needed at all? it isn't needed on non-Windows systems it seems. As far as fixing things you're right. We need to fix this asap. > get fixed. You guys are holding up beta release with work that by any > legitimate definition is new-feature development, and shouldn't be under > consideration at all at this point. As I said, I considered this work bug fixes or else I wouldn't have committed the patches at this time. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Michael Meskes wrote: > It it appears to me that the MSVC > build problem has existed for weeks or months but no one noticed so far, > right? > This is absolutely not true. We have been building ecpg successfully on MSVC all along, just not testing. See for example the make log at http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=red_bat&dt=2007-09-30%20043002&stg=make and search for "Project: libecpg" The builds only broke 2 or 3 days ago. cheers andrew
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:53:58PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> It it appears to me that the MSVC >> build problem has existed for weeks or months but no one noticed so far, >> right? > > This is absolutely not true. We have been building ecpg successfully on > MSVC all along, just not testing. See for example the make log at > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=red_bat&dt=2007-09-30%20043002&stg=make > and search for "Project: libecpg" Sorry, my bad. Seems I got this mixed up. Once we enabled testing for ecpg we had some problems to be sorted out, but right now only the DllMain thing seems to be a problem. Since I do not know whether we really need DllMain could anyone please test whether ecpg builds correctly without it? We can then sort out how to fix the problem later on. AFAIRC (and hopefully I'm right this time) multithreading never worked under msvc so we might have to set thread-safety to disabled on these systems for ecpg for the time being. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> Sorry, my bad. Seems I got this mixed up. Once we enabled testing for
> ecpg we had some problems to be sorted out, but right now only the
> DllMain thing seems to be a problem.
> Since I do not know whether we really need DllMain could anyone please
> test whether ecpg builds correctly without it?
It looks to me like we should not need it, if we instead add code to
initialize the mutexes properly on Windows (a la the way it's done
in libpq). I can prepare a patch, but I don't have the ability to
test it on Windows --- will anyone be around who can, in an hour or so?
regards, tom lane
Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:53:58PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> It it appears to me that the MSVC >>> build problem has existed for weeks or months but no one noticed so far, >>> right? >> This is absolutely not true. We have been building ecpg successfully on >> MSVC all along, just not testing. See for example the make log at >> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=red_bat&dt=2007-09-30%20043002&stg=make >> and search for "Project: libecpg" > > Sorry, my bad. Seems I got this mixed up. Once we enabled testing for > ecpg we had some problems to be sorted out, but right now only the > DllMain thing seems to be a problem. There are two problems: 1) DllMain breaks the build *completely*. This is the really urgent one. This one broke 2 days ago or so. 2) Regression tests don't pass on MSVC anymore. This broke a while ago. I was working on fixing this, but now that the build is broken there isn't much I can do until that's fixed. > Since I do not know whether we really need DllMain could anyone please > test whether ecpg builds correctly without it? We can then sort out how > to fix the problem later on. AFAIRC (and hopefully I'm right this time) > multithreading never worked under msvc so we might have to set > thread-safety to disabled on these systems for ecpg for the time being. We could move the initialization somewhere else, but it needs to be somewhere. Also, see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00006.php for another comment on this. This changes more than just the threading stuff, but if it's something we want then this is a good time to do it. //Magnus
Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes: >> Sorry, my bad. Seems I got this mixed up. Once we enabled testing for >> ecpg we had some problems to be sorted out, but right now only the >> DllMain thing seems to be a problem. > >> Since I do not know whether we really need DllMain could anyone please >> test whether ecpg builds correctly without it? > > It looks to me like we should not need it, if we instead add code to > initialize the mutexes properly on Windows (a la the way it's done > in libpq). I can prepare a patch, but I don't have the ability to > test it on Windows --- will anyone be around who can, in an hour or so? Should be doable. I can probably (but not certainly, so if someone else is around that'd be nice) get close enough to remote a windows box to test that a build passes, but remember that we can't really run the regression tests on msvc right now :-( //Magnus
I wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Since I do not know whether we really need DllMain could anyone please
>> test whether ecpg builds correctly without it?
> It looks to me like we should not need it, if we instead add code to
> initialize the mutexes properly on Windows (a la the way it's done
> in libpq).
Hm, I take that back --- the other reason it's there is as a kluge to
avoid supporting pthread_once(). This code all looks pretty darn hokey,
not to mention that it ought to be merged with libpq's pthread-win32.c,
but fixing it seems not a one-hour proposition.
>> AFAIRC (and hopefully I'm right this time)
>> multithreading never worked under msvc so we might have to set
>> thread-safety to disabled on these systems for ecpg for the time being.
If it didn't work then this seems clearly new-feature-development.
I think Magnus' idea of providing an exports list would be worth trying,
if someone can try it promptly; failing that, we need to revert this
patch.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > test that a build passes, but remember that we can't really run the > regression tests on msvc right now :-( But then we definitely need to fix this, regardless of the DllMain thing. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> test that a build passes, but remember that we can't really run the >> regression tests on msvc right now :-( > > But then we definitely need to fix this, regardless of the DllMain thing. Absolutely, but we need to fix the DllMain thing first. //Magnus
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:37:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> AFAIRC (and hopefully I'm right this time) > >> multithreading never worked under msvc so we might have to set > >> thread-safety to disabled on these systems for ecpg for the time being. > > If it didn't work then this seems clearly new-feature-development. Well, ecpg was said to work with multithreading but didn't. However, since the patch works on most archs if indeed fixes some bugs on those archs. > I think Magnus' idea of providing an exports list would be worth trying, > if someone can try it promptly; failing that, we need to revert this > patch. Couldn't we just disable multithreading for Windows resp. MSVC? It appears to me that the rest of the patch is working as advertized. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:22:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > There are two problems: > 1) DllMain breaks the build *completely*. This is the really urgent one. > This one broke 2 days ago or so. > > 2) Regression tests don't pass on MSVC anymore. This broke a while ago. > I was working on fixing this, but now that the build is broken there > isn't much I can do until that's fixed. When did they break? I'm still confused. Did we run regression tests at all before? Or did they never work and we just didn't notice because the buildfarm didn't run them? > Also, see > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00006.php for > another comment on this. This changes more than just the threading > stuff, but if it's something we want then this is a good time to do it. So, does an explicit export list help? If so I'm all for it. There is no need to export all symbols. I always tried to keep the number of symbols that get exported but are not needed low. So this will give the best result possible. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:22:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> There are two problems: >> 1) DllMain breaks the build *completely*. This is the really urgent one. >> This one broke 2 days ago or so. >> >> 2) Regression tests don't pass on MSVC anymore. This broke a while ago. >> I was working on fixing this, but now that the build is broken there >> isn't much I can do until that's fixed. > > When did they break? I'm still confused. Did we run regression tests at > all before? Or did they never work and we just didn't notice because the > buildfarm didn't run them? I ran them manually, but then I thought the buildfarm did so I didn't bother doing it. Turned out I was wrong and it didn't, so we missed the breakage for a while. They were broken during the major update. I think it's as simple as changing the way ecpg is called (that was the first problem at least), so it's probably an easy fix. >> Also, see >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00006.php for >> another comment on this. This changes more than just the threading >> stuff, but if it's something we want then this is a good time to do it. > > So, does an explicit export list help? If so I'm all for it. There is no > need to export all symbols. I always tried to keep the number of symbols > that get exported but are not needed low. So this will give the best > result possible. Yeah, it does seem to fix it. Can you put together explicit-export-list for the Unix case, using the way libpq does it (using an exports.txt file, and then the same Makefile rules as libpq uses). Once that's done I can deal with the MSVC part of that, but since I don't know exactly which symbols need to be exported... //Magnus
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
>> So, does an explicit export list help? If so I'm all for it. There is no
>> need to export all symbols. I always tried to keep the number of symbols
>> that get exported but are not needed low. So this will give the best
>> result possible.
> Yeah, it does seem to fix it.
That's very good news. If Michael can put together an export list
soon then we'll be in good shape.
Michael: you should bump the major version number of ecpglib when you do
this. Removing the not-officially-exported visible symbols *is* an ABI
break. You may think there isn't anything depending on them, but
remember how we thought that (twice) for libpq too. Bumping the major
version number will be cheap insurance against complaints later.
regards, tom lane
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Absolutely, but we need to fix the DllMain thing first. Here is a patch to remove DllMain from libecpg on Win32 build. I brought the initialization routine from libpq and implemented pthread_once() using a lock that serializes all pthread_once calls. I don't have msvc build environment, but I hope it will fix the build failure on it. On another matter, this patch includes removing descriptors field in struct connection. This was my mistake in the previous fix of descriptors. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:54:44AM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > Here is a patch to remove DllMain from libecpg on Win32 build. > I brought the initialization routine from libpq and implemented > pthread_once() using a lock that serializes all pthread_once calls. > I don't have msvc build environment, but I hope it will fix the > build failure on it. We will see. Since it doesn't break my linux system I committed the patch. If anyone notices a problem please tell me. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:07:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > > Michael Meskes wrote: > >> So, does an explicit export list help? If so I'm all for it. There is no > >> need to export all symbols. I always tried to keep the number of symbols > >> that get exported but are not needed low. So this will give the best > >> result possible. > > > Yeah, it does seem to fix it. > > That's very good news. If Michael can put together an export list > soon then we'll be in good shape. I will work on it asap. > Michael: you should bump the major version number of ecpglib when you do > this. Removing the not-officially-exported visible symbols *is* an ABI > break. You may think there isn't anything depending on them, but > remember how we thought that (twice) for libpq too. Bumping the major > version number will be cheap insurance against complaints later. ecpg received a bump from 5 to 6 in this release anyway because of some other ABI changes, so at least here we're fine. :-) Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:58:18AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:54:44AM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > > Here is a patch to remove DllMain from libecpg on Win32 build. > > I brought the initialization routine from libpq and implemented > > pthread_once() using a lock that serializes all pthread_once calls. > > I don't have msvc build environment, but I hope it will fix the > > build failure on it. > > We will see. Since it doesn't break my linux system I committed the > patch. If anyone notices a problem please tell me. Heh, I was about to review that. I'll try to get to it right after lunch. //Magnus
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:13:27AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Heh, I was about to review that. I'll try to get to it right after lunch. Thanks and sorry for jumping the gun. If it doesn't work we can remove it easily. I'm working on an export list atm. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:19:14PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:13:27AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Heh, I was about to review that. I'll try to get to it right after lunch. > > Thanks and sorry for jumping the gun. If it doesn't work we can remove > it easily. Np. It passes compile. Rebuilding my full tree now to try to work on making the regression tests actually be able to test it. > I'm working on an export list atm. Good. I think we want that regardless of things being fixed by removing Dllmain. //Magnus
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It passes compile. Rebuilding my full tree now to try to work on making the > regression tests actually be able to test it. Sounds good. :-) > > I'm working on an export list atm. > > Good. I think we want that regardless of things being fixed by removing > Dllmain. Just committed. I also renamed the functions that are not exported to make this job easier. Should there be a problem with this it should only be a missed rename. However the new sources successfully run through the regression suite on my Linux system with and without multithreading. As for the export list I copied the stuff from libpq, it's untested on all other archs. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:13:58PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > It passes compile. Rebuilding my full tree now to try to work on making the > > regression tests actually be able to test it. > > Sounds good. :-) At least we're proceeding. Going further, all the new threading tests fail on msvc. Haven't investigated why yet, but will do. > > > I'm working on an export list atm. > > > > Good. I think we want that regardless of things being fixed by removing > > Dllmain. > > Just committed. I also renamed the functions that are not exported to > make this job easier. Should there be a problem with this it should only > be a missed rename. However the new sources successfully run through the > regression suite on my Linux system with and without multithreading. > > As for the export list I copied the stuff from libpq, it's untested on > all other archs. Ok. I'll take a look at that on msvc when I'm done with the reg tests, but I'll try to get those running first. //Magnus
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:13:58PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > Just committed. I also renamed the functions that are not exported to > make this job easier. Should there be a problem with this it should only > be a missed rename. However the new sources successfully run through the > regression suite on my Linux system with and without multithreading. > > As for the export list I copied the stuff from libpq, it's untested on > all other archs. I've update the msvc build to deal with this, and it works. However, shouldn't we be doing it for other ECPG libraries as well? //Magnus
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > However, shouldn't we be doing it for other ECPG libraries as well? Done. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > However, shouldn't we be doing it for other ECPG libraries as well? > > Done. Added to MSVC build. //Magnus