Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

7 February 2003

03:33 Performance jeandre@itvs.co.za
03:46 Re: Performance Shridhar Daithankar
05:22 postgres on solaris 8 Christian Toepp
05:59 Re: postgres on solaris 8 Justin Clift
09:55 Re: Performance Tom Lane
10:10 Re: Performance jeandre@itvs.co.za
10:14 Re: Performance Tom Lane
10:47 Re: Performance jeandre@itvs.co.za
11:22 Re: how to configure my new server scott.marlowe
11:46 Re: how to configure my new server Peter Darley
12:17 Re: how to configure my new server Josh Berkus
12:21 Re: Performance Josh Berkus
12:42 Re: how to configure my new server scott.marlowe
13:07 Re: how to configure my new server eric soroos
13:42 Re: how to configure my new server Andreas Pflug
16:13 Re: how to configure my new server scott.marlowe
18:21 Re: how to configure my new server Andreas Pflug

10 February 2003

06:15 Re: how to configure my new server philip johnson
12:36 Re: how to configure my new server Josh Berkus
12:59 Re: how to configure my new server philip johnson

11 February 2003

07:27 ... jeandre@itvs.co.za
08:29 Re: Andrew Sullivan

12 February 2003

00:52 Re: how to configure my new server Bruce Momjian
06:52 Re: how to configure my new server Justin Clift

13 February 2003

00:16 More benchmarking of wal_buffers Christopher Kings-Lynne
00:36 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Bruce Momjian
01:29 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Neil Conway
03:32 JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Darryl A. J. Staflund
04:20 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Rafal Kedziorski
06:00 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 pginfo
13:06 cost and actual time Chantal Ackermann
15:08 Re: cost and actual time Josh Berkus
18:19 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Nick Pavlica
21:29 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Tom Lane
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Christopher Kings-Lynne
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Christopher Kings-Lynne
22:10 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Tom Lane
22:15 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Christopher Kings-Lynne
22:46 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Kevin Brown
22:55 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Darryl A. J. Staflund
23:16 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Tom Lane
23:19 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Tom Lane
23:21 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Josh Berkus
23:23 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Tom Lane

14 February 2003

00:31 Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Kevin Brown
01:04 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Tom Lane
06:48 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Kevin Brown
07:35 Re: JBoss CMP Performance Problems with PostgreSQL 7.2.3 Bruce Momjian
08:12 Re: [HACKERS] Terrible performance on wide selects Bruce Momjian
09:30 Re: WAL replay logic (was Re: Mount options for Ext3?) Bruce Momjian
10:05 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Tom Lane
11:13 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) johnnnnnn
11:44 performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE Scott Cain
12:00 Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE Tom Lane
12:29 Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE Scott Cain
12:37 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Josh Berkus
13:10 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Josh Berkus
14:22 Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM Scott Cain
15:02 Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE ShengQiang Shu
18:48 Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE Tom Lane
19:08 Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE SLetovsky@aol.com
19:11 Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM ANALYZE Tom Lane

15 February 2003

03:29 Re: [HACKERS] WAL replay logic (was Re: Mount options for Curt Sampson
03:36 Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers Curt Sampson
15:36 Re: [Gmod-schema] Re: performace problem after VACUUM Scott Cain
18:48 Views with unions Mariusz Czułada
22:55 Re: Views with unions Josh Berkus

16 February 2003

03:19 Re: Views with unions Mariusz Czułada
13:05 Re: Views with unions Stephan Szabo
13:51 Re: Views with unions Tom Lane
15:29 Re: Views with unions Mariusz Czułada
18:03 Good performance? Rafal Kedziorski
23:44 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Barry Lind

17 February 2003

04:11 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Rafal Kedziorski
05:52 Re: cost and actual time Chantal Ackermann
05:59 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Tomasz Myrta
06:23 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Rafal Kedziorski
07:26 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Justin Clift
07:42 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Rafal Kedziorski
11:22 Re: cost and actual time Tom Lane
11:49 Re: cost and actual time Manfred Koizar
12:50 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Barry Lind
15:04 Re: [JDBC] Good performance? Josh Berkus

18 February 2003

00:16 Re: [HACKERS] WAL replay logic (was Re: Mount options for Bruce Momjian
05:29 Re: cost and actual time Chantal Ackermann
12:32 Re: cost and actual time Manfred Koizar
12:38 Re: Questions about indexes? Josh Berkus
14:48 Performance Baseline Script Keith Bottner
15:43 Re: Performance Baseline Script Josh Berkus
16:45 Data write speed Josh Berkus
17:22 Re: Data write speed Hannu Krosing
17:27 Re: Data write speed Kevin Brown
18:51 Re: Data write speed Josh Berkus
20:21 Re: Data write speed Justin Clift
23:50 pgsql-hackers-owner, LIVE FROM WALL STREET: VICC Test Results Are In.......... incomingforward@cs.com

19 February 2003

03:10 Re: Questions about indexes? Ryan Bradetich
04:39 Re: cost and actual time Chantal Ackermann
05:34 Re: cost and actual time Manfred Koizar
10:03 Re: Performance Baseline Script Tom Lane
10:14 Re: Performance Baseline Script Justin Clift
10:42 Re: Performance Baseline Script Andrew Sullivan
12:52 Re: Questions about indexes? Josh Berkus
21:38 Re: Performance Baseline Script Justin Clift

20 February 2003

01:19 Peluang Usaha yang Luar Biasa Ahmad Abdul Haq
03:42 Write ahead logging Matthias Meixner
04:19 Re: Write ahead logging Manfred Koizar
04:36 Re: Write ahead logging Mario Weilguni
05:01 Re: cost and actual time Manfred Koizar
05:06 Re: Peluang Usaha yang Luar Biasa Mike Nielsen
06:32 Re: Questions about indexes? Curt Sampson
18:01 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration) Josh Berkus
18:44 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default Robert Treat
18:55 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default Andrew Sullivan

21 February 2003

02:45 performance issues for processing more then 150000 records / day. Jakab Laszlo
03:04 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 records / day. Christopher Kings-Lynne
03:37 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 records / day. Jakab Laszlo
03:45 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 records / day. Shridhar Daithankar
04:16 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 Justin Clift
04:54 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 Jakab Laszlo
05:32 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 Shridhar Daithankar
09:27 Re: Write ahead logging Matthias Meixner
10:34 Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Kevin White
10:49 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Kevin White
10:49 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Tom Lane
10:53 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Shridhar Daithankar
11:28 slow query Oleg Lebedev
11:59 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Andrew Sullivan
12:22 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Kevin White
12:52 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Andrew Sullivan
13:09 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? scott.marlowe
14:25 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Kevin White
14:51 Re: cost and actual time Christopher Kings-Lynne
21:47 Re: slow query Tom Lane
21:50 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Tom Lane

22 February 2003

01:59 Re: Really bad insert performance: what did I do wrong? Tom Lane

23 February 2003

15:49 Re: performance issues for processing more then 150000 Josh Berkus
15:53 Re: slow query Josh Berkus
16:05 Re: slow query Ryan Bradetich
16:49 Re: slow query Josh Berkus
21:46 Re: slow query Tom Lane

24 February 2003

04:59 partitioning os swap data log tempdb Schaefer, Mario
05:31 Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb Shridhar Daithankar
07:18 Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb Andrew Sullivan
10:57 Re: slow query Oleg Lebedev
12:20 Re: slow query Robert Treat
12:26 Re: slow query Oleg Lebedev
12:58 Re: slow query Clarence Gardner
13:12 Re: slow query Oleg Lebedev
13:49 Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb scott.marlowe
13:55 Memory taken by FSM_relations Josh Berkus
13:57 Re: slow query Robert Treat
14:08 Re: slow query Josh Berkus
14:08 Re: slow query Rod Taylor
14:14 Re: slow query Andrew Sullivan
14:23 Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb Josh Berkus
14:30 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations Joe Conway
14:54 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations Josh Berkus
15:16 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations Larry Rosenman
15:25 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations scott.marlowe
15:43 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations Josh Berkus
16:04 Re: slow query Robert Treat
16:33 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations Tom Lane
18:22 Re: slow query Tom Lane

25 February 2003

02:56 Superfluous merge/sort Anuradha Ratnaweera
05:40 Query not using the index Mark Halliwell
07:59 Re: Query not using the index Andrew Sullivan
08:49 Re: Query not using the index Bruno Wolff III
10:21 Re: Query not using the index Tom Lane
10:40 Re: slow query Robert Treat
11:10 Re: Superfluous merge/sort Stephan Szabo
11:19 Re: slow query Tom Lane
11:50 Re: slow query Peter Childs
18:06 Faster 'select count(*) from table' ? Matt Mello
18:50 Re: Faster 'select count(*) from table' ? scott.marlowe
23:57 Re: Superfluous merge/sort Anuradha Ratnaweera

26 February 2003

00:40 Re: Superfluous merge/sort Stephan Szabo
01:27 Index File growing big. PRAGATI SAVAIKAR
02:32 Re: Index File growing big. Rajesh Kumar Mallah
07:09 Re: Index File growing big. Andrew Sullivan
08:04 daniel alvarez
09:02 Re: OIDs as keys Richard Huxton
09:59 Re: OIDs as keys daniel alvarez
11:01 Re: OIDs as keys Tom Lane
11:10 Re: OIDs as keys Tom Lane
11:14 Re: OIDs as keys Richard Huxton
12:24 Re: OIDs as keys Josh Berkus
20:19 Re: Index File growing big. Christopher Kings-Lynne
22:59 Re: OIDs as keys Christopher Kings-Lynne

27 February 2003

01:47 Re: OIDs as keys Tom Lane
01:57 Re: Index File growing big. Tom Lane
01:59 Re: OIDs as keys Christopher Kings-Lynne
02:09 Re: OIDs as keys Tom Lane
02:42 Re: OIDs as keys Tom Lane
04:03 Re: Index File growing big. Christopher Kings-Lynne
07:19 Daily crash Catalin
07:23 Re: Daily crash Shridhar Daithankar
07:41 Re: Index File growing big. Jim Buttafuoco
07:53 Re: Daily crash Catalin
08:04 Re: Daily crash Shridhar Daithankar
08:16 Re: Daily crash Bruno Wolff III
08:22 tsearch performance Chantal Ackermann
09:43 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash Aspire Something
09:54 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash Catalin
12:22 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash Josh Berkus
12:27 Re: Data write speed Josh Berkus
13:32 Re: Data write speed scott.marlowe
14:27 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash philip johnson
15:44 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash Catalin
22:10 Re: OIDs as keys Ron Mayer

28 February 2003

08:41 ... Jeandre du Toit
09:30 Re: [Performance] Daily Crash Catalin
19:35 Re: OIDs as keys Christopher Kings-Lynne
19:36 Re: OIDs as keys Christopher Kings-Lynne