> > You should note that someone already has sent in a patch for
tablespaces, it
> > hasn't been acted on though - can't quite remember why. Maybe we should
> > resurrect it...
>
> It's been awhile, but my recollection is that the patch had restricted
> functionality (which would be okay for a first cut) and it invented SQL
> syntax that seemed to lock us into that restricted functionality
> permanently (not so okay). Details are fuzzy though...
Well, I'll resurrect it and see if it can be improved. Tablespaces seem to
be a requested feature these days...
Chris
