All,
I was the person who submitted the patch. I tried to a generic syntax. I also tried to keep the tablespace concept
simple. See my posting on HACKERS/GENERAL from a week or 2 ago about the syntax. I am still interested in working on
this patch with others. I have many system here that are 500+ gigabytes and growing. It is a real pain to add more
disk space (I have to backup, drop database(s), rebuild raid set (I am using raid 10) and reload data).
Jim
> > > You should note that someone already has sent in a patch for
> tablespaces, it
> > > hasn't been acted on though - can't quite remember why. Maybe we should
> > > resurrect it...
> >
> > It's been awhile, but my recollection is that the patch had restricted
> > functionality (which would be okay for a first cut) and it invented SQL
> > syntax that seemed to lock us into that restricted functionality
> > permanently (not so okay). Details are fuzzy though...
>
> Well, I'll resurrect it and see if it can be improved. Tablespaces seem to
> be a requested feature these days...
>
> Chris
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
