Memory taken by FSM_relations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date
Msg-id 200302241028.00309.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
List pgsql-performance
Folks:

I'm not clear on where the memory needed by max_fsm_pages comes from.   Is it
taken out of the shared_buffers, or in addition to them?

Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.  Does anyone have a good
measurment of the memory load imposed by higher FSM settings?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: slow query