Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date
Msg-id 3E5A6E66.4030408@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Memory taken by FSM_relations  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
> rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
> swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.

I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
guesstimate. Can you provide some context?

Joe

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning os swap data log tempdb
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations