Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0302241233340.14019-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Joe Conway wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which seems
> > rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value (10000) would
> > swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.
>
> I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
> guesstimate. Can you provide some context?

If I remember right, it was 6 BYTES per max fsm pages...  not kbytes.
That sounds about right anyway.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations