Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date
Msg-id 251960000.1046115334@lerlaptop.iadfw.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-performance

--On Monday, February 24, 2003 11:11:34 -0800 Joe Conway
<mail@joeconway.com> wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which
>> seems  rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value
>> (10000) would  swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.
>
> I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
> guesstimate. Can you provide some context?
It may be 6 **BYTES** per max_fsm_pages.


>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations