Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 February 2017

• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding OOM in a hash join with many duplicate inner keys Tom Lane
• 02:55   [HACKERS] Implement custom join algorithm Amin Fallahi
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding OOM in a hash join with many duplicate inner keys Thomas Munro
• 05:04   [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Stephen Frost
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode Amit Langote
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Stephen Frost
• 06:45   Re: [HACKERS] Implement custom join algorithm Tom Lane
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT Amit Langote
• 07:25   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT Peter Geoghegan
• 08:05   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index-only scan Rafia Sabih
• 08:17   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq Prabakaran, Vaishnavi
• 08:27   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT Amit Langote
• 08:48   Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning Ashutosh Bapat
• 08:50   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT Peter Geoghegan
• 08:52   [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test Tom Lane
• 08:55   Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning Ashutosh Bapat
• 09:14   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Ashutosh Bapat
• 09:16   [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Thomas Munro
• 09:47   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT Amit Langote
• 10:16   Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps insideExecEndGather) Kouhei Kaigai
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes Amit Kapila
• 10:41   Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag Thomas Munro
• 10:42   Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode Amit Langote
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag Thomas Munro
• 11:23   [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Amit Langote
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R Magnus Hagander
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Magnus Hagander
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Alexander Korotkov
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Amit Khandekar
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Ashutosh Sharma
• 12:50   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Alexander Korotkov
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge Thomas Munro
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge Amit Kapila
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real Greg Stark
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge Rushabh Lathia
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 Andreas Karlsson
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test Amit Kapila
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge Rushabh Lathia
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new function dsa_allocate0. Robert Haas
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real Robert Haas
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Stephen Frost
• 16:37   Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R Alvaro Herrera
• 16:43   Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 Andreas Karlsson
• 16:51   [HACKERS] [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. Mithun Cy
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM authentication, take three Michael Paquier
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 Michael Paquier
• 17:13   Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 17:14   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION uninterruptable Peter Eisentraut
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Provide list of subscriptions and publications inpsql's completion Peter Eisentraut
• 17:33   Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Stephen Frost
• 17:37   Re: [HACKERS] Provide list of subscriptions and publications inpsql's completion Stephen Frost
• 17:51   [HACKERS] Question about memory contexts in ReindexMultipleTables() Andreas Karlsson
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R Stephen Frost
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication and Character encoding Peter Eisentraut
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with--disable-integer-datetimes Alvaro Herrera
• 18:39   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Keith Fiske
• 18:45   Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test Tom Lane
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Alvaro Herrera
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R Tom Lane
• 19:23   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Keith Fiske
• 19:26   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Amit Khandekar
• 19:26   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation Amit Khandekar
• 19:31   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add pg_disable_checksums() and supporting infrastructure Magnus Hagander
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Alvaro Herrera
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new function dsa_allocate0. Tom Lane
• 20:17   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Peter Geoghegan
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION uninterruptable Thom Brown
• 20:45   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 David E. Wheeler
• 20:45   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Tom Lane
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add pg_disable_checksums() and supportinginfrastructure David Christensen
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Peter Geoghegan
• 21:13   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with--disable-integer-datetimes Alvaro Herrera
• 21:15   [HACKERS] Keeping pg_recvlogical's "feTimestamp" separate from TimestampTz Tom Lane
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress Jim Nasby
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Reporting xmin from VACUUMs Jim Nasby
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] Does having a NULL column automatically exclude thetable from the tupleDesc cache? Jim Nasby
• 22:17   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint Jim Nasby
• 22:40   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 22:48   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Andres Freund
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Mark Dilger
• 23:04   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 23:05   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Thomas Munro
• 23:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane