Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRf6dDPhKhevdXNSfN3eXDaC2Ec5Yy5HvLJxkTy_-1AeeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
In the documentation of ALTER TABLE ... ATTACH PARTITION its implicit
that partition name specified should be the name of the existing table
being attached. Same is the case with DETACH PARTITION where its
implicit that the detached partition becomes a stand-alone table with
same name as the partition being detached. I think this needs to be
more explicit. PFA patch on those lines.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT