Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

4 February 2017

00:38 Re: [HACKERS] Cannot shutdown subscriber after DROP SUBSCRIPTION Fujii Masao
00:42 Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Alvaro Herrera
00:55 Re: [HACKERS] new autovacuum criterion for visible pages Jeff Janes
01:09 Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again Pavel Stehule
01:12 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan
01:42 Re: [HACKERS] Add pgstathashindex() to get hash index table statistics. Robert Haas
01:58 Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1 Peter Geoghegan
02:03 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
02:31 Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Bernd Helmle
02:34 Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Robert Haas
02:49 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Robert Haas
03:17 Re: [HACKERS] new autovacuum criterion for visible pages Alvaro Herrera
03:24 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
03:35 Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pageinspect: Try to fix some bugsin previous commit. Robert Haas
03:37 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Robert Haas
03:39 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal Robert Haas
03:53 [HACKERS] libpq Alternate Row Processor Kyle Gearhart
03:55 Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support Robert Haas
04:17 Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions Robert Haas
04:24 Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again Serge Rielau
04:47 Re: [HACKERS] Enabling replication connections by default in pg_hba.conf Michael Paquier
04:47 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Robert Haas
04:58 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan
05:00 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Andres Freund
05:01 Re: [HACKERS] Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol Michael Paquier
05:01 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal Kevin Grittner
05:07 Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes Jeff Janes
05:23 Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Jim Nasby
05:31 Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund
05:44 Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Robert Haas
05:46 Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside ExecEndGather) Claudio Freire
05:47 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Robert Haas
05:49 Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take Robert Haas
05:54 Re: [HACKERS] Superowners Robert Haas
06:03 Re: [HACKERS] multivariate statistics (v19) Robert Haas
06:07 Re: [HACKERS] Redundant comment in ExecutePlan Robert Haas
06:08 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Andres Freund
06:09 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Robert Haas
06:11 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Andres Freund
06:12 Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby
06:15 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Thomas Munro
06:20 Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund
06:24 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Robert Haas
06:32 [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy Jim Nasby
06:39 Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy Andres Freund
06:42 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Jim Nasby
06:46 Re: [HACKERS] libpq Alternate Row Processor Jim Nasby
06:53 Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Jim Nasby
07:13 Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy Jim Nasby
07:21 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
07:26 Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby
07:33 Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy Andres Freund
07:34 Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund
07:44 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Amit Kapila
07:45 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan
08:14 Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pageinspect: Try to fix some bugs in previous commit. Ashutosh Sharma
08:16 Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes Amit Kapila
11:14 Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again Pavel Stehule
11:31 Re: [HACKERS] libpq Alternate Row Processor Tom Lane
11:50 [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ? Shinoda, Noriyoshi
12:40 Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Amit Kapila
13:19 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions Konstantin Knizhnik
13:26 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Fabien COELHO
14:41 [HACKERS] 3D Z-curve spatial index Boris Muratshin
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench more operators & functions Fabien COELHO
16:38 Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support Ashutosh Sharma
16:49 [HACKERS] pg_restore foreign keys NOT VALID, or [assume] VALID; VALIDATECONSTRAINT CONCURRENTLY Tomasz Ostrowski
17:37 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) Daniel Verite
18:01 Re: [HACKERS] Provide list of subscriptions and publications inpsql's completion Michael Paquier
18:06 Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support Ashutosh Sharma
18:30 Re: [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ? Michael Paquier
19:06 Re: [HACKERS] Constraint exclusion failed to prune partition in caseof partition expression involves function call amul sul
20:11 Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY Pavan Deolasee
21:43 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Masahiko Sawada
22:47 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
22:53 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
23:57 [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's releases are up for review Tom Lane