On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Shouldn’t the singular part of the message above be:
>>> "%u two-phase state file was written for a long-running prepared transaction"
>>>
>>> But, then, English is not my native language, so I might be off here :-)
>>
>> If there's one file per long-running prepared transaction, which I
>> think is true, then I agree with you.
>
> PFA, small patch to fix this, then.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
