On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> One thing to think about is what will happen if someday we want to use
> 64-bit hash codes (a day I think is not that far away). It sounds like
> you've already chosen bigint for any output field that represents a
> hash code or a related value such as a mask ... but it wouldn't hurt
> to look through the fields with that in mind.
Yeah, I think we're fine on that score.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company