Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYcCCXRrZAC88C6k81fakNdmFJTgmrKiHmNW97M1s0eZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I still haven't seen a credible model for being able to apply a stream
> of interleaved transactions that can roll back individually; I think we
> really need the ability to have multiple transactions alive in one
> backend for that.

Hmm, yeah, that's a problem.  That smells like autonomous transactions.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside ExecEndGather)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take