Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

11 February 2017

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Faster Expression Processing and Tuple Deforming(including JIT) Andres Freund
• 00:14   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Josh Berkus
• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Peter Geoghegan
• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andres Freund
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Robert Haas
• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Robert Haas
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Josh Berkus
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Magnus Hagander
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andres Freund
• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Magnus Hagander
• 00:39   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andres Freund
• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Robert Haas
• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andres Freund
• 00:41   Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION and ROLLBACK Masahiko Sawada
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Magnus Hagander
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andrew Dunstan
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. Robert Haas
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. Robert Haas
• 02:24   Re: [HACKERS] removing tsearch2 Andrew Dunstan
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] log_autovacuum_min_duration doesn't log VACUUMs Robert Haas
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] sequence data type Peter Eisentraut
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE Peter Eisentraut
• 03:36   Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC Peter Eisentraut
• 03:36   Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Fabien COELHO
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Reporting xmin from VACUUMs Robert Haas
• 04:09   Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Corey Huinker
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Reporting xmin from VACUUMs Alvaro Herrera
• 05:06   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Craig Ringer
• 05:15   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Andres Freund
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Tomas Vondra
• 06:38   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tomas Vondra
• 07:13   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators Tomas Vondra
• 07:17   Re: [HACKERS] multivariate statistics (v19) Tomas Vondra
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators Andres Freund
• 07:39   Re: [HACKERS] amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) Peter Geoghegan
• 07:41   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators Andres Freund
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Ashutosh Sharma
• 07:54   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Tomas Vondra
• 09:08   Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers Rafia Sabih
• 10:22   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Amit Kapila
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress Pavel Stehule
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan Dilip Kumar
• 13:43   Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) Fabien COELHO
• 15:38   [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint Michael Banck
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint Magnus Hagander
• 16:16   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 16:19   [HACKERS] Access inside pg_node_tree from query? Ryan Murphy
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint Michael Banck
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint Michael Banck
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION and ROLLBACK Petr Jelinek
• 18:21   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Alexander Korotkov
• 18:40   Re: [HACKERS] Access inside pg_node_tree from query? Michael Paquier
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Alexander Korotkov
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Tomas Vondra
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines Tomas Vondra
• 19:40   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators Tomas Vondra
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? Ashutosh Sharma
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] [ patch ] pg_dump: new --custom-fetch-table and--custom-fetch-value parameters Andrea Urbani
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Robert Haas
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Robert Haas