On 12/31/16 11:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> I still think that some wording in the direction of the fact that the
>> majority of all users won't actually have this problem is the right thing
>> to do (regardless of our previous history in the area as pointed out by
>> Craig)
>
> +1. The use-a-system-user solution is the one that's in place on the
> ground for most current PG users on affected platforms. We should explain
> that one first and make clear that platform-specific packages attempt to
> set it up that way for you. The RemoveIPC technique should be documented
> as a fallback to be used if you can't/won't use a system userid.
How about this version, which shifts the emphasis a bit, as suggested?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
