Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id 20170217161245.tbjodkmk2wsaupet@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Keith Fiske <keith@omniti.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
List pgsql-hackers
Keith Fiske wrote:

> Was just curious if anyone was able to come up with any sort of method to
> test whether an index was corrupted by this bug, other than just waiting
> for bad query results? We've used concurrent index rebuilding quite
> extensively over the years to remove bloat from busy systems, but
> reindexing the entire database "just in case" is unrealistic in many of our
> cases.

As stated, if the CREATE INDEX operates on columns that are previously
already indexed (which is normally the case when you rebuild because of
bloat) then there is no chance of index corruption.

Scanning indexes+tables is just as load-intensive as rebuilding the
indexes anyway.  You don't save any work.  I suppose it can be a problem
if you have an index big enough that it doesn't fit on your remaining
free space (but in that case you have a pre-existing problem which you
should solve anyway).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes