Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

18 February 2017

• 00:13   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with--disable-integer-datetimes Alvaro Herrera
• 00:15   [HACKERS] Keeping pg_recvlogical's "feTimestamp" separate from TimestampTz Tom Lane
• 00:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress Jim Nasby
• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] Reporting xmin from VACUUMs Jim Nasby
• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] Does having a NULL column automatically exclude thetable from the tupleDesc cache? Jim Nasby
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint Jim Nasby
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Andres Freund
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Mark Dilger
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 02:05   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Thomas Munro
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Mark Dilger
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Andres Freund
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade Stephen Frost
• 05:22   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint Tomas Vondra
• 05:24   [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 05:37   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with--disable-integer-datetimes Peter Eisentraut
• 06:00   Re: [HACKERS] 2 doc typos Peter Eisentraut
• 06:10   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Mark Dilger
• 06:10   Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup -R Peter Eisentraut
• 06:16   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes thereshould be per DATA() line Peter Eisentraut
• 06:22   Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes Tom Lane
• 06:36   Re: [HACKERS] patch: optimizeinformation_schema.constraint_column_usage Peter Eisentraut
• 06:38   Re: [HACKERS] Official adoption of PGXN Peter Eisentraut
• 06:43   Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint David G. Johnston
• 08:34   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add pg_disable_checksums() and supportinginfrastructure David Christensen
• 08:57   Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test Amit Kapila
• 09:19   [HACKERS] pg_get_object_address() doesn't support composites Jim Nasby
• 09:53   Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_object_address() doesn't support composites Alvaro Herrera
• 10:01   [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Jim Nasby
• 10:14   Re: [HACKERS] Official adoption of PGXN Jim Nasby
• 10:19   Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Alvaro Herrera
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Jim Nasby
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_object_address() doesn't support composites Jim Nasby
• 10:46   Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Alvaro Herrera
• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Jim Nasby
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index-only scan Amit Kapila
• 13:08   [HACKERS] new gcc 7.0.1 warnings Pavel Stehule
• 16:31   [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) Alexander Korotkov
• 18:49   Re: [HACKERS] Help text for pg_basebackup -R Magnus Hagander
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge Amit Kapila
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 19:48   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Petr Jelinek
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Petr Jelinek
• 20:26   Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Small issue in online devel documentationbuild Fabien COELHO
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Provide list of subscriptions and publications inpsql's completion Petr Jelinek
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] "SQL sentence"? Jim Nasby
• 23:10   [HACKERS] Suppressing that pesky warning with older flex versions Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan Dilip Kumar
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test Robert Haas
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] new gcc 7.0.1 warnings Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: [HACKERS] new gcc 7.0.1 warnings Pavel Stehule