Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

25 February 2017

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 Bruce Momjian
• 00:21   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Ants Aasma
• 00:32   [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describecommands, when size is printed Pavel Stehule
• 00:56   Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes Petr Jelinek
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Petr Jelinek
• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators Andres Freund
• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Peter Geoghegan
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Andrew Dunstan
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins Tom Lane
• 02:05   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 02:08   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Petr Jelinek
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins Andres Freund
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins Andres Freund
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Petr Jelinek
• 04:07   [HACKERS] Oblivious nested loop join algorithm Amin Fallahi
• 06:38   Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. Amit Kapila
• 07:30   Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside ExecEndGather) Kohei KaiGai
• 08:20   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) Pavan Deolasee
• 08:59   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join Amit Kapila
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy Erik Rijkers
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join Dilip Kumar
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid Simon Riggs
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL orother PL functions Amit Kapila
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join Amit Kapila
• 16:24   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches Peter Eisentraut
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions Peter Eisentraut
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog Magnus Hagander
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog Magnus Hagander
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API Michael Paquier
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog Michael Paquier
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog Magnus Hagander
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL orother PL functions Dilip Kumar
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Andrew Dunstan
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Emre Hasegeli
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Andrew Dunstan
• 20:54   [HACKERS] Reduce lock levels for reloptions Simon Riggs
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type Julien Rouhaud
• 21:11   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Greg Stark
• 21:14   [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Tom Lane
• 21:27   [HACKERS] PL/Python: Add cursor and execute methods to plan object Peter Eisentraut
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Andrew Dunstan
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Joshua D. Drake
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums Andrew Dunstan
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] Should `pg_upgrade --check` check relation filenodesare present? Bruce Momjian
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Tom Lane
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Andrew Dunstan
• 22:01   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key David G. Johnston
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API Simon Riggs
• 23:11   Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure Andrew Dunstan
• 23:30   Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE Simon Riggs