Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJK4NvtLazjM=WCg5c-Zg1HMo7hwphTXwCcukfJ=QuTXA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 February 2017 at 16:33, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>  I'll be happy to review

Patch looks OK so far, but fails on a partition that has partitions,
probably because of the way we test relkind in the call to
StoreCatalogInheritance1().

Please add a test for that so we can check automatically.

Thanks very much.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?