Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date
Msg-id 4e730f28-742b-45e9-d507-4d292fbd7834@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 02/25/2017 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it'd be better to leave DirectFunctionCallN alone and just invent
> a small number of CallerFInfoFunctionCallN support functions (maybe N=1
> and N=2 would be enough, at least for now).
>
>             


See attached.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Emre Hasegeli
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Reduce lock levels for reloptions