Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQw44DovpoZkZghmJA42h3Z1oz-YfR0tbSOVihkAwFShw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Oh, I definitely think such a command should be able to take a placeholder
> like %f telling which segment it has just processed. In fact, I'd consider
> it one of the most important features of it :)

I cannot think about any other meaningful variables, do you?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)