Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

16 November 2010

• 00:49   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Robert Haas
• 00:56   unlogged tables Andy Colson
• 01:15   Re: Spread checkpoint sync Robert Haas
• 01:28   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 01:43   Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking Robert Haas
• 01:49   Re: Count backend self-sync calls Greg Smith
• 02:17   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support Robert Haas
• 03:09   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support Tom Lane
• 07:58   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Alexander Korotkov
• 08:36   Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? Shigeru HANADA
• 09:01   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Magnus Hagander
• 09:25   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Dave Page
• 10:08   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Alexander Korotkov
• 10:39   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running Magnus Hagander
• 10:45   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Magnus Hagander
• 12:17   track_functions default Magnus Hagander
• 13:42   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: track_functions default Tom Lane
• 14:13   GCC vs clang Greg Sabino Mullane
• 14:16   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Magnus Hagander
• 14:16   Re: GCC vs clang Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: track_functions default Magnus Hagander
• 14:29   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Magnus Hagander
• 14:35   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Tom Lane
• 14:44   Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? Magnus Hagander
• 15:06   Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:13   autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Alvaro Herrera
• 15:22   Re: GCC vs clang Peter Eisentraut
• 15:32   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Itagaki Takahiro
• 15:33   GiST insert algorithm rewrite Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:41   Re: Per-column collation Peter Eisentraut
• 16:11   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking Greg Stark
• 16:20   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:27   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas
• 16:32   Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? Eric Davies
• 17:01   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: GCC vs clang Greg Sabino Mullane
• 17:09   Re: unlogged tables Andy Colson
• 17:10   Re: GCC vs clang Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane
• 17:22   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:29   Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 17:36   Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED Robert Haas
• 17:36   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Josh Berkus
• 17:40   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas
• 17:44   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Joshua D. Drake
• 17:46   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Robert Haas
• 17:51   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:52   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Josh Berkus
• 17:58   Re: unlogged tables Alvaro Herrera
• 18:01   Re: Per-column collation Pavel Stehule
• 18:04   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Alvaro Herrera
• 18:06   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 18:06   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Robert Haas
• 18:21   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Teodor Sigaev
• 18:41   Re: Per-column collation Peter Eisentraut
• 18:44   Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking Robert Haas
• 18:49   Re: unlogged tables Peter Eisentraut
• 18:50   possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior Jignesh Shah
• 18:50   Re: track_functions default Cédric Villemain
• 18:54   Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking Greg Stark
• 19:00   Re: Per-column collation Pavel Stehule
• 19:05   Re: Per-column collation marcin mank
• 19:07   Re: Explain analyze getrusage tracking Robert Haas
• 19:08   Re: possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior Jignesh Shah
• 19:08   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 19:09   Re: Per-column collation Pavel Stehule
• 19:26   Re: unlogged tables Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Re: Per-column collation Peter Eisentraut
• 19:32   Re: Per-column collation Peter Eisentraut
• 19:34   Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem Josh Berkus
• 19:41   Re: Per-column collation Pavel Stehule
• 19:46   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane
• 19:51   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:53   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Robert Haas
• 19:56   Re: Per-column collation Peter Eisentraut
• 20:04   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: Per-column collation Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:34   Re: unlogged tables Andrew Dunstan
• 20:37   Re: unlogged tables Peter Eisentraut
• 20:41   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support Peter Eisentraut
• 20:43   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 21:00   Re: unlogged tables Josh Berkus
• 21:07   Re: unlogged tables David Fetter
• 21:08   Re: unlogged tables Peter Eisentraut
• 21:12   Re: unlogged tables Josh Berkus
• 21:16   Re: unlogged tables Joshua D. Drake
• 21:19   Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY Peter Eisentraut
• 21:22   Re: unlogged tables Andrew Dunstan
• 21:22   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: unlogged tables Joshua D. Drake
• 21:26   Re: possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior Kevin Grittner
• 21:28   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: unlogged tables Andres Freund
• 21:36   Re: unlogged tables Kevin Grittner
• 21:39   Re: Per-column collation Tom Lane
• 21:39   Re: unlogged tables Andres Freund
• 21:42   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: unlogged tables Josh Berkus
• 21:51   Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 21:58   Re: unlogged tables marcin mank
• 23:41   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 23:46   Re: unlogged tables Tom Lane