Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Subject | Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4CE2ABFD.5090505@enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Responses |
Re: B-tree parent pointer and checkpoints
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.11.2010 00:34, Greg Stark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I think we can work around that with a small modification to the page split >> algorithm. In a nutshell, when the child page is split, put a flag on the >> left half indicating that the rightlink must always be followed, regardless >> of the NSN. When the downlink is inserted to the parent, clear the flag. >> Setting and clearing of these flags need to be performed during WAL replay >> as well. > > Does this not cause duplicate results? Or does GIST already have to be > prepared to deal with duplicate results? The GiST search algorithm avoids duplicate results by remembering the LSN on the parent page when it follows a downlink. The split currently happens like this: 0. (the child page is locked) 1. The parent page is locked. 2. The child page is split. The original page becomes the left half, and new buffers are allocated for the right halves. 3. The downlink is inserted on the parent page (and the original downlink is updated to reflect only the keys that stayed on the left page). While keeping the child pages locked, the NSN field on the children are updated with the new LSN of the parent page. To avoid duplicates, when a scan looks at the child page, it needs to know if it saw the parent page before or after the downlink was inserted. If it saw it before, the scan needs to follow the rightlink to the right half, otherwise it will follow the downlink as usual (if it matched). The scan checks that by comparing the LSN it saw on the parent page with the NSN on the child page. If parent LSN < NSN, we saw the parent before the downlink was inserted. Now, the problem with crash recovery is that the above algorithm depends on the split to keep the parent and child locked until the downlink is inserted in the parent. If you crash between steps 2 and 3, the locks are gone. If a later insert then updates the parent page, because of a split on some unrelated child page, that will bump the LSN of the parent above the NSN on the child. Scans will see that the parent LSN > child NSN, and will no longer follow the rightlink. And the fix for that is to set a flag on the child page indicating that rightlink has to be always followed regardless of the LSN/NSN, because the downlink hasn't been inserted yet. When the downlink is inserted, the flag is cleared and we rely on the existing LSN/NSN mechanism to avoid duplicate results. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
pgsql-hackers by date: