Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

19 November 2010

• 00:35   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Cédric Villemain
• 01:17   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 01:40   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) Itagaki Takahiro
• 01:43   Changes to Linux OOM killer in 2.6.36 Greg Smith
• 02:18   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 03:52   Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds Greg Smith
• 05:41   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 06:48   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) David Fetter
• 06:54   Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid Pavel Stehule
• 07:07   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 07:34   Re: contrib: auth_delay module KaiGai Kohei
• 07:34   Re: Label switcher function KaiGai Kohei
• 09:16   Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:26   Re: Fate of the old cvs repository Magnus Hagander
• 11:50   Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds Alvaro Herrera
• 12:14   Re: Changes to Linux OOM killer in 2.6.36 Kevin Grittner
• 13:15   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:16   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:27   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Robert Haas
• 13:29   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 13:31   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:33   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Aidan Van Dyk
• 13:36   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 13:38   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:49   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:50   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 13:50   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 13:51   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 13:55   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 13:55   Re: Label switcher function Robert Haas
• 13:55   Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? Shigeru HANADA
• 13:58   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Aidan Van Dyk
• 14:02   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 14:05   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 14:05   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Aidan Van Dyk
• 14:06   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 14:12   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Markus Wanner
• 14:22   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Alvaro Herrera
• 14:25   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 14:41   What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 14:44   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 14:51   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 14:51   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 14:58   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Markus Wanner
• 15:19   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 15:26   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 15:57   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Alvaro Herrera
• 16:04   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 16:14   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 16:14   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Florian Weimer
• 16:46   Re: contrib: auth_delay module Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:46   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 17:29   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Kevin Grittner
• 17:49   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) 
• 17:52   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Kevin Grittner
• 18:04   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 18:06   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) David Fetter
• 18:26   how correctly detoast a Datum value? Pavel Stehule
• 18:31   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) Alvaro Herrera
• 18:34   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund
• 18:43   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:05   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Alvaro Herrera
• 19:10   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 19:39   Re: Changes to Linux OOM killer in 2.6.36 Alex Hunsaker
• 19:44   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 20:13   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) 
• 20:16   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Andres Freund
• 20:28   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump José Arthur Benetasso Villanova
• 20:28   Re: Changes to Linux OOM killer in 2.6.36 Greg Smith
• 20:46   Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids Joachim Wieland
• 20:56   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Alvaro Herrera
• 21:41   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Joachim Wieland
• 21:53   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 22:08   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid Jeff Janes
• 22:53   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Joachim Wieland
• 22:57   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Andres Freund