Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id 29581.1290180313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The patch is touching protocol.sgml as follows. Isn't this enough?

> How about some updates to the "Message Flow" section, especially the
> section on "COPY Operations"?

Yeah.  You're adding a new fundamental state to the protocol; it's not
enough to bury that in the description of a message format.  I don't
think a whole lot of new verbiage is needed, but the COPY section needs
to point out that this is a different state that allows both send and
receive, and explain what the conditions are for getting into and out of
that state.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: duplicate connection failure messages
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)