Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinHGKcFAQydmhHM--6qU5L_x+nLBtaAsTm4wcxf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Just in a quick scan, I don't have any objection to v2 except that the
>>> protocol documentation is lacking.
>>
>> OK, I'll mark it Waiting on Author pending that issue.
>
> The patch is touching protocol.sgml as follows. Isn't this enough?

How about some updates to the "Message Flow" section, especially the
section on "COPY Operations"?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)