Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Date
Msg-id 4CE674D60200002500037C2E@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> What you typically need is a guarantee about the order in which
> writes become visible.
> In some cases you also need to guarantee the order of reads.
Doesn't that suggest different primitives?
-Kevin

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)