Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Date
Msg-id 201011191551.17695.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 19 November 2010 15:49:45 Robert Haas wrote:
> If we're going to work on memory primitives, I would much rather see
> us put that effort into, say, implementing more efficient LWLock
> algorithms to solve the bottlenecks that the MOSBENCH guys found,
> rather than spending it on trying to avoid a minor API complication
> for the latch facility.
But for that you will need more infrastructure in that area anyway.

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)