Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

20 November 2010

• 00:01   Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index Steve Singer
• 00:01   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) David Fetter
• 02:18   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Robert Haas
• 02:46   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Robert Haas
• 02:51   Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 03:10   Re: directory archive format for pg_dump Joachim Wieland
• 03:54   Re: UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) Itagaki Takahiro
• 07:00   Re: Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid Pavel Stehule
• 11:21   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Robert Haas
• 11:22   Re: Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid Robert Haas
• 11:30   Re: Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid Pavel Stehule
• 11:33   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Yeb Havinga
• 12:15   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Alexander Korotkov
• 14:38   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Robert Haas
• 16:34   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Tom Lane
• 16:45   match_clause_to_indexcol() Robert Haas
• 17:02   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Robert Haas
• 17:32   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Tom Lane
• 17:33   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Robert Haas
• 17:38   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Robert Haas
• 17:51   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Robert Haas
• 17:59   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 17:59   Re: match_clause_to_indexcol() Robert Haas
• 18:04   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Robert Haas
• 18:08   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 18:09   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 18:41   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Andres Freund
• 18:47   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Andres Freund
• 19:12   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Greg Stark
• 19:21   Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 19:51   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Yeb Havinga
• 20:08   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: Fix for seg picksplit function Yeb Havinga
• 20:09   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Tom Lane
• 20:19   Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? Dimitri Fontaine
• 22:08   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Bruce Momjian
• 22:21   Re: Spread checkpoint sync Jeff Janes
• 22:54   Re: knngist - 0.8 Robert Haas
• 23:50   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Greg Stark