Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

18 November 2010

• 00:53   Re: Label switcher function Robert Haas
• 01:31   Re: Label switcher function Robert Haas
• 01:54   Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: MergeAppend costing Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: Indent authentication overloading Jeroen Vermeulen
• 04:28   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Merlin Moncure
• 04:47   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: Indent authentication overloading Stuart Bishop
• 05:05   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 05:12   Unused parameter in vacuum.c Shigeru HANADA
• 07:06   Re: Unused parameter in vacuum.c Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:14   Re: unlogged tables Dimitri Fontaine
• 07:52   Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY Itagaki Takahiro
• 09:00   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Cédric Villemain
• 11:55   Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Fujii Masao
• 11:58   Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:19   Which data structures for the index? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 12:40   Re: Which data structures for the index? Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:44   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 14:08   Re: duplicate connection failure messages Alvaro Herrera
• 14:24   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Merlin Moncure
• 14:25   Re: unlogged tables Robert Haas
• 14:37   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Cédric Villemain
• 14:40   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Robert Haas
• 14:45   EXPLAIN and nfiltered Marko Tiikkaja
• 14:51   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Cédric Villemain
• 14:52   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 14:56   Re: Which data structures for the index? Vaibhav Kaushal
• 14:58   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 15:01   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Andrew Dunstan
• 15:03   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Cédric Villemain
• 15:09   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Marko Tiikkaja
• 15:37   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 15:44   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Andres Freund
• 15:48   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Marko Tiikkaja
• 15:52   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Andres Freund
• 16:19   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Alvaro Herrera
• 16:26   Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered Robert Haas
• 16:36   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 16:44   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 16:49   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Robert Haas
• 16:56   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 17:01   Re: Indent authentication overloading Josh Berkus
• 17:04   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 17:12   Re: Indent authentication overloading Aidan Van Dyk
• 17:17   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Robert Haas
• 17:22   Re: Indent authentication overloading Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: Indent authentication overloading Magnus Hagander
• 17:36   Re: Indent authentication overloading Tom Lane
• 17:36   Re: Indent authentication overloading Andrew Dunstan
• 17:42   Re: Indent authentication overloading Josh Berkus
• 17:47   Re: Indent authentication overloading Magnus Hagander
• 17:48   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 17:48   Re: Indent authentication overloading Josh Berkus
• 17:57   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Alvaro Herrera
• 18:15   Re: Indent authentication overloading Greg Stark
• 18:16   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Alvaro Herrera
• 18:16   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 18:20   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: describe objects, as in pg_depend Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: Indent authentication overloading Magnus Hagander
• 18:31   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Andrew Dunstan
• 18:32   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 18:35   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 18:38   Re: Per-column collation Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:40   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 18:45   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Andrew Dunstan
• 18:47   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 19:00   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 19:12   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Alvaro Herrera
• 19:18   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Pavel Stehule
• 20:13   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Robert Haas
• 20:35   Re: possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior Kevin Grittner
• 21:17   Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Tom Lane
• 22:06   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Andres Freund
• 22:33   UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) David Fetter
• 22:41   Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array Andrew Dunstan