2010/11/18 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> i will start the review of this one... but before that sorry for
>>> suggesting this a bit later but about using UNNEST as part of the
>>> sintax?
>
>> Does for-in-array do what unnset does?
>
> Yes, which begs the question of why bother at all. AFAICS this patch
> simply allows you to replace
>
> for x in select unnest(array_value) loop
>
> with
>
> for x in unnest array_value loop
>
> (plus or minus a parenthesis or so). I do not think we need to add a
> bunch of code and create even more syntactic ambiguity (FOR loops are
> already on the hairy edge of unparsability) to save people from writing
> "select".
this patch is semantically equal to SELECT unnest(..), but it is
evaluated as simple expression and does directly array unpacking and
iteration, - so it means this fragment is significantly >>faster<<.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
>
