Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Date
Msg-id 4CE5825C.2080803@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
List pgsql-hackers

On 11/18/2010 02:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/11/18 Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>:
>>
>> On 11/18/2010 02:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>   -only a few people use FOR IN SELECT UNNEST for iteration over array.
>> How on earth do you know that? I use it a lot and I was just demonstrating
>> it to a client yesterday, and I'm quite sure he will use it a lot too. I bet
>> I'm far from alone.
>>
> how much people are active readers and writers in pg_hackers like you? :)
>
> I didn't say so nobody use it. You, me, David. But I really didn't see
> this pattern here in real applications.
>

Lots of people are told to use it on IRC. Trust me, it's getting well known.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array