On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:36, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other
>>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term
>>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an
>>> old name for it. Is that really too confusing?
>
>> Yes, that's the current proposal - and also have the system log that
>> "ident is deprecated, use peer" when it's found in the files.
>
> Personally I could do without that little frammish. We don't issue
> wrist-slaps for other obsolete usages; why single out this one?
Fair enough. I may be guilty of thinking we should do it more often
;), but I agree that being consistent is more important.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
