Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Date
Msg-id 201011191536.36458.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 19 November 2010 15:29:10 Andres Freund wrote:
> Besides, we can just jump into the kernel and back in that case (which the
> TAS  implementation already does), that does more than just a fence...
Or if you don't believe that is enough initialize a lock on the stack, lock 
and forget it...

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)