Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Date
Msg-id 27353.1289918712@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> BTW, it seems like it'd be a good thing if we had a Win64 machine in the
>>> buildfarm.

>> Yes. I actually thought we had one. Dave, weren't you going to set one up?

> I was, but I saw one there so didn't bother (hamerkop). Windows
> buildfarm critters can take a surprising amount of herding...

hamerkop seems to have gone AWOL around the time of the git conversion.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: track_functions default