Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 4CE2EACF.10703@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Relevant to this is the question: *when* does vacuum do its memory
>> allocation?  Is memory allocation reasonably front-loaded, or does
>> vacuum keep grabbing more RAM until it's done?
> 
> All at start.

That means that "allocation by halves" would work fine.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-column collation
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-column collation