Re: GCC vs clang - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GCC vs clang
Date
Msg-id 28276.1289920609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to GCC vs clang  (Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> writes:
> I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at 
> least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached 
> patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a 
> better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the 
> GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that 
> removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make 
> takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an 
> issue for another day.

What happens to plperl?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: track_functions default