Re: GCC vs clang - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: GCC vs clang
Date
Msg-id 1289924508.31200.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to GCC vs clang  (Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: GCC vs clang
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-11-16 at 09:41 -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at 
> least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached 
> patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a 
> better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the 
> GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that 
> removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make 
> takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an 
> issue for another day.

The underlying issue in clang has been resolved, so the next release
should work out of the box.  I suggest we wait for that.

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5365



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem