Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

9 November 2005

• 00:02   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Jim C. Nasby
• 00:29   Re: Enums again Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:04   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Joe Conway
• 01:14   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:15   compiling on windows with mingw Gevik babakhani
• 01:28   Re: lc_numeric and decimal delimiter Andrew Dunstan
• 02:03   Re: Exclusive lock for database rename daveg
• 02:30   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Robert Creager
• 06:18   Accessing libq functions from UDF (shared library) Gayathri TK
• 06:28   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Teodor Sigaev
• 06:40   Re: Accessing libq functions from UDF (shared library) Richard Huxton
• 06:54   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Teodor Sigaev
• 07:07   FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to ContribCheck failure Dave Page
• 07:20   Re: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed Teodor Sigaev
• 07:22   Re: compiling on windows with mingw Adrian Maier
• 07:42   Re: Exclusive lock for database rename Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:50   Re: Exclusive lock for database rename daveg
• 08:27   Optimization of the alignment padding ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 10:02   How postgres find OID of function from opclassoid sandeep satpal
• 11:41   Re: plperl error when making 8.2dev CVS Jaime Casanova
• 11:48   Re: compiling on windows with mingw Petr Jelinek
• 12:04   Re: plperl error when making 8.2dev CVS Alvaro Herrera
• 12:13   Re: Optimization of the alignment padding Alvaro Herrera
• 13:37   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Robert Creager
• 13:47   Re: compiling on windows with mingw Andrew Dunstan
• 13:56   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Andrew Dunstan
• 14:06   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Gregory Maxwell
• 14:23   Re: plperl error when making 8.2dev CVS Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Tom Lane
• 14:44   Re: [GENERAL] Troubles with array_ref Cristian Prieto
• 14:57   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: Possible savepoint bug Rod Taylor
• 15:15   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Marc Munro
• 15:19   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:22   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:54   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Robert Creager
• 15:55   Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload Robert Creager
• 17:24   Re: Optimization of the alignment padding Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: compiling on windows with mingw Kevin Grittner
• 17:28   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Ron Mayer
• 17:38   Possible savepoint bug Rod Taylor
• 17:55   Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays Tom Lane
• 18:20   Re: Possible savepoint bug Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Possible savepoint bug Rod Taylor
• 19:56   Re: [BUGS] BUG #2033: Assertion Failure: File: "procarray.c", Line: 492 Tom Lane
• 21:24   Install issue on Windows and directory permission Gevik babakhani
• 21:26   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Simon Riggs
• 21:42   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: Install issue on Windows and directory Kevin Grittner
• 22:54   Re: Install issue on Windows and directory Andrew Dunstan