Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

4 November 2005

• 00:42   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Gregory Maxwell
• 01:15   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags Tom Lane
• 01:17   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 14:12   postgresql-8.1RC1 on Solaris 10, amd64x2 Cedric Berger
• 15:19   somebody could explain this? Cristian Prieto
• 15:22   PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: postgresql-8.1RC1 on Solaris 10, amd64x2 Andrew Dunstan
• 15:45   Re: somebody could explain this? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:46   Re: somebody could explain this? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:49   Re: somebody could explain this? Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 16:30   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Csaba Nagy
• 16:40   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA Kevin Grittner
• 16:51   Constraint exclusion description bug? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:57   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Kevin Grittner
• 16:58   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Bruno Wolff III
• 17:01   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list Chris Browne
• 17:07   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Merlin Moncure
• 17:14   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Tom Lane
• 17:14   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 David Fetter
• 17:15   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Tom Lane
• 17:21   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Magnus Hagander
• 17:21   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Bruce Momjian
• 17:23   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:25   Re: Constraint exclusion description bug? Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: insert performance for win32 Merlin Moncure
• 17:28   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 17:30   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Magnus Hagander
• 17:37   Re: insert performance for win32 Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Otto Hirr
• 18:13   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:36   Re: somebody could explain this? Csaba Nagy
• 18:36   Crash during elog.c... Jim C. Nasby
• 18:42   Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 Dann Corbit
• 18:43   Re: somebody could explain this? Otto Hirr
• 18:59   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Gregory Maxwell
• 19:04   Re: Crash during elog.c... Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Gregory Maxwell
• 19:20   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Tom Lane
• 19:23   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 19:40   Re: [OT] somebody could explain this? Kevin Grittner
• 20:04   Re: Crash during elog.c... Jim C. Nasby
• 20:06   Re: insert performance for win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 20:18   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Gurjeet Singh
• 20:23   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 20:26   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Jim C. Nasby
• 20:31   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 20:32   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 20:37   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Tom Lane
• 20:37   Re: Crash during elog.c... Bruce Momjian
• 21:02   Re: Exclusive lock for database rename Jim C. Nasby
• 21:07   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 21:08   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Jim C. Nasby
• 21:21   Re: Crash during elog.c... Jim C. Nasby
• 21:22   Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list Bruce Momjian
• 21:26   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Andrew Dunstan
• 21:42   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Jim C. Nasby
• 22:05   Possible problem with pg_reload_conf() and view pg_settings Tony Caduto
• 22:40   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Martijn van Oosterhout
• 23:11   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Mark Wong
• 23:12   Re: Seeing context switch storm with 10/13 snapshot of Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Gregory Maxwell
• 23:18   Re: Possible problem with pg_reload_conf() and view pg_settings Tom Lane
• 23:46   Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 Marc G. Fournier