Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
Date
Msg-id 200511041821.jA4IL7117478@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:01:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
> > > Nailed it.
> >
> > > problem is in mainloop.c -> setup_cancel_handler.  Apparently you
> > > can have multiple handlers and windows keeps track of them all,
> > > even if they do the same thing.  Keeping track of so many system
> > > handles would naturally slow the whole process down.
> >
> > Yipes.  So we really want to do that only once.
> >
> > AFAICS it is appropriate to move the sigsetjmp and
> > setup_cancel_handler calls in front of the per-line loop inside
> > MainLoop --- can anyone see a reason not to?
> >
> > I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
> > performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
> > script would probably crash a Windows machine.
>
> Ouch.  In light of this, are we *sure* what we've got a is a candidate
> for release?

Good point.  It is something we would fix in a minor release, so it
doesn't seem worth doing another RC just for that.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data