Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
Date
Msg-id 1131267605.8300.2055.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:01:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
> > > performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
> > > script would probably crash a Windows machine.
> >
> > Ouch.  In light of this, are we *sure* what we've got a is a candidate
> > for release?
>
> Good point.  It is something we would fix in a minor release, so it
> doesn't seem worth doing another RC just for that.

Will this be documented in the release notes? If we put unimplemented
features in TODO, where do we list things we regard as bugs?

Best Regards, Simon Riggs


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: pgInstaller 8.1 built