Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
Date
Msg-id 436E38EE.2000708@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>  
>
>>David Fetter wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:01:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
>>>>performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
>>>>script would probably crash a Windows machine.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Ouch.  In light of this, are we *sure* what we've got a is a candidate
>>>for release?
>>>      
>>>
>>Good point.  It is something we would fix in a minor release, so it
>>doesn't seem worth doing another RC just for that.
>>    
>>
>
>Will this be documented in the release notes? If we put unimplemented
>features in TODO, where do we list things we regard as bugs?
>
>
>  
>

No need, I think. It was patched 2 days ago.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 8.1 supported platforms list: IRIX is MIA
Next
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgInstaller 8.1 built