Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 November 2005

• 00:19   regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales Andrew Dunstan
• 02:13   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales Tom Lane
• 03:28   Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English Petr Jelinek
• 06:34   Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ... Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 06:34   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Simon Riggs
• 10:32   FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build strk@refractions.net
• 10:33   Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Peter Eisentraut
• 10:34   Adding a column in pg_proc for storing default values of arguments Salman Razzaq
• 11:16   Re: Differences in UTF8 between 8.0 and 8.1 Paul Lindner
• 11:43   [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales] Andrew Dunstan
• 12:35   Re: Adding a column in pg_proc for storing default values of arguments Tom Lane
• 12:41   Re: [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines with some non-English locales] Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Tom Lane
• 13:22   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Alvaro Herrera
• 14:08   Re: Call for port reports Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 14:37   Re: [Fwd: Re: regression failures on WIndows in machines Andrew Dunstan
• 14:41   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Marc G. Fournier
• 14:58   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Andrew Dunstan
• 15:46   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build strk@refractions.net
• 16:05   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Peter Eisentraut
• 16:28   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Tom Lane
• 16:39   Debug in dest.h Alvaro Herrera
• 16:45   Re: FreeBSD broke with autoconf-based build Marc G. Fournier
• 17:14   Re: Debug in dest.h Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Jim C. Nasby
• 17:49   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Jim C. Nasby
• 17:49   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:21   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: slru.c race condition Chris Browne
• 18:51   Re: slru.c race condition Chris Browne
• 19:38   Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Bundled ... Devrim GUNDUZ
• 19:48   Re: slru.c race condition Alvaro Herrera
• 20:24   Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Simon Riggs
• 20:33   Attn: Richard Huxton Dave Page
• 20:54   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:38   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 21:39   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 21:40   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 21:48   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Simon Riggs
• 21:49   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Jim C. Nasby
• 21:55   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Simon Riggs
• 22:04   Re: slru.c race condition Chris Browne
• 22:05   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data Tom Lane