On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:22:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com> writes:
> > How about representing null array elements with a special-case cast-like
> > null? Something like {::null}
>
> The problem with *any* proposal for let's-spell-NULL-like-this
> is that "this" is inevitably a string that is valid as a text
> data value. Making the string weirder may reduce the odds of
> a failure but the risk is still there, and meanwhile you're making
> the null marker less readable. (The above has the additional problem
> of being indistinguishable from a sub-array.)
>
> I think we really need something that is rejected as syntactically
> invalid by the existing array input parser.
Hehehe... Feeling silly here:
{1,2,}NULL{,4,5,}NULL
What are the feelings on representing it similar to how it would be
in memory?
{1,2,,4,5,}(,,NULL,,,NULL)
Then, there is always the possibility of including a new array text format
for arrays that contain nulls (Q for quote?):
Q{1,2,NULL,4,5,NULL}
This would activate a mode that would fully quote any non-numeric,
non-array arguments, allowing NULL to be unambiguous?
Q{'a','b',NULL,'c','d',NULL}
Cheers,
mark
--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness
bindthem...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
